Sunday, May 2, 2010
Air quality in Maine
Monday, April 26, 2010
Assignment 13-2 (Environmental issue in Maine)
Sources of information:
http://www.nrcm.org/issue_windpower.asp
http://www.environmentmaine.org/newsroom/energy
http://www.encyclopedia.com/doc/1P1-126992214.html
http://www.environmentmaine.org/clean-air
http://www.maine.gov/dep/air/lev4me/index.html
http://www.nrcm.org/project_cleanair.asp
http://www.nrcm.org/issue_cleanenergy.asp
http://www.maine.gov/dep/air/ozone/
http://www.maine.gov/dep/air/ozone/currentdata.html
http://www.nrcm.org/news_detail.asp?news=3564
http://www.scorecard.org/env-releases/hap/state.tcl?fips_state_code=23
Graphics:
http://www.maine.gov/dep/air/toxics/images/REFINERY.JPG
http://www.maine.gov/dep/air/toxics/images/fallscene.jpg
http://alg.umbc.edu/usaq/images/pm25_super_2004-07-23.gif
http://environmentdebate.files.wordpress.com/2007/01/air_pollution_china.jpg
http://maine.sierraclub.org/East%20End%20PV.JPG
Tuesday, April 20, 2010
Assignment 12-1
ORONO, ME -The body of a 20 year-old UMaine student was found by a passerby around 5:40 a.m on Middle Street on January 30. For two and a half months police have been searching for a suspect in Jordyn Bakley's death, and on Friday morning around 6 a.m., they found him. Police have arrested Garrett Cheney, 22 of South Berwick, in connection with the death of Bakley.
Cheney has been charged with manslaughter, leaving the scene of an accident that resulted in death to a person, aggravated criminal operating under the influence and criminal operating under the influence. He turned himself in to Maine State Police after finding out there was a warrant out for his arrest.
Bakley was a junior elementary education student from Camden, Maine. She was active in the Student Women’s Association and recently had her photography displayed at the Hunting House Gallery in Orono. According to the state medical examiner's office, Bakley died of blunt force trauma.
Cheney was in Orono on January 29 to celebrate his cousins 21st birthday. The two visited a couple of bars and drank together before Cheney left a bar on Middle St. around 3 a.m. The court affidavit states that Cheney struck Bakley while driving on Middle Street on the wrong side of the road shortly after 3 a.m. The collection of evidence, such as part of the vehicle's grill which led to the discovery of the vehicle that struck Bakley, led to Cheney's arrest.
Images retrieved from the Maine Campus
http://mainecampus.com/2010/04/16/arrest-made-in-bakley-hit-and-run/?ref=hp
The court affidavit states that Cheney then headed south on I-95 and drove his truck off the road in Etna around 3:30 a.m., on January 30. He is alleged to have been driving home to South Berwick, 181 miles from Orono. He was charged with operating under the influence and was found to have a blood alcohol content of 0.15-nearly twice the legal limit.
Cheney’s bail was set at $50,000 surety or $20,000 cash and he posted the surety around 4 p.m. Friday. He is scheduled to have his first court appearance on May 20 at the Penobscot County Judicial Center. If convicted of manslaughter, Cheney faces up to 30 years in prison.
Wednesday, March 31, 2010
Assignment 10-1
Friday, March 26, 2010
Meeting/Speech
Lucy Honig returned to Maine on Thursday, March 25 to speak about her new book “Waiting for Rescue”. Honig began her writing career in Maine, later moving to New York and then to Massachusetts. Honig has appeared in 2 O’Henry prize collections and in the Best American Short Stories. She spoke at the Writing Center, 4th floor Neville Hall, at 4:30 on Thursday.
Honig was introduced and her books were for sale at the meeting. There were 16 people present at the meeting, and these people ranged from young college students to older faculty members. Honig introduced her book, described the plot, characters and ethics of the book, then read several excerpts to entice readers while still allowing mystery for those who hadn’t yet read it.
Honig opened the floor to questions after reading excerpts of her book, and members of the audience asked about her characters emotions and thoughts, her writing process and her life experiences. Honig talked about how her books are semi-autobiographical and described the life experiences they are based on.
Honig discussed the writing process of her latest book. The book was originally short stories, but Honig connected all the short stories using one character. “When I first started this book I had a lot of stories I wanted to write so I started writing short stories on the same document. Eventually I tried to sort them out into 5 or 6 stories, but something in me said ‘these are not separate stories’ and I made them converge” Honig finished with book-signings and received applause from the audience.
Friday, March 19, 2010
Anthem sues the state of Maine over denial of request to increase rates
Anthem Blue Cross-Blue Shield, the largest insurance company in Maine, is suing the state of Maine after being denied permission to increase insurance rates. Anthem requested a rate increase by as much as 37.8%, but was denied by Maine Insurance Superintendent Mila Kofman. The company claims the increase in cost is necessary to compensate for growing costs and an increase in the use of health care services. Anthem is a subsidiary of the national insurance company WellPoint, Inc.
Anthem Blue Cross-Blue Shield bought out a non-profit insurance company and has raised premium rates 10 times since. The average individual insurance-payer in Maine pays more than four times as much for insurance as they did ten years ago; before Anthem had a monopoly on Maine’s insurance market. The company controls about 79% of the Maine health care insurance market and provides service to more than 12,000 people statewide.
Anthem is suing after being denied a 3% guaranteed profit margin for 2010. Anthem’s rates have gone up 85% in the last 10 years in Maine. (3) A lawyer in the Attorney General’s office claims that going a year without a guaranteed profit will not drain the company and Mila Kofman calls Anthem’s request “excessive”. (3) Mila Kofman granted Anthem an average 10.9% rate increase last year, rather than Anthem’s proposed rate increase of 18.5%. Anthem retaliated by suing the state and has proposed an average 23% increase for the year 2010. (2)
But the citizens of Maine are saying no to Anthem. About 100 people turned out at the Cumberland County Civic Center to protest Anthem on March 18. A chiropractor practicing in Waldoboro said “My business has already been hit hard by the recession. If Anthem increased rates even more then less people would come see me for treatments and I don’t think my business-an 18 year-old, family business-will survive. Maine citizens can’t pay any more for insurance”.
The federal government is pointing at Anthem and other WellPoint subsidiaries requesting rate hikes in states like California as even more reason to create universal health care. President Obama notes rate hikes as a cautionary tale unless extensive health reform is executed. A veteran who receives free medical care through Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center (VA) Togus in Augusta says “I go there for medicine I need and I’m not going to be able to get this medicine if rates increase even more. I need this stuff, but Anthem doesn’t care”.
The state of Maine has no obligation to guarantee profits if the rate increases are discriminatory towards customers or excessive. Anthem is claiming that they are being discriminated against relative to other companies in Maine because another individual insurer in Maine was provided a 3% profit and risk margin for 2010. (1) Anthem’s claim is that this violates their equal protection rights under both the federal and state Constitutions. (4) However, there is no statute mandating that Maine provide Anthem or any other insurance company with a guaranteed profit.
Joe Ditre, executive director of Consumers for Affordable Health Care, Maine’s largest consumer-health coalition, says “health insurer’s profit expectations may have to change”. (2) Anthem made $4.7 billion profit in 2009 and is expecting even larger returns in 2010. “Companies are entitled to make some profit…however, it can’t be over the public good” Ditre said.
1. Dayen, David. (2009, October 5). WellPoint Sues Maine To Raise Premiums 18.5%. The Seminal. Retrieved from:http://seminal.firedoglake.com/
2. De Hoyos, Martha. (2009, October 5). WellPoint, Inc. Subsidiary Sues State of Maine for Failing to Guarantee Annual Profit Margin of 3%. Common Dreams. Retrieved from: http://www.commondreams.org
3. Gerencher, Kristen. (2010, February 18). States grapple with health-insurer rate hikes. Market Watch. Retrieved from:http://marketwatch.com
4. Huang, Josie. (2009, October 5). Anthem Sues State of Maine over Rate Hike Request Denial. MPBN. Retrieved from:http://www.mpbn.net/
5. Thompson, Adam. (2009, October 8). Health Insurer Sues Maine for Guaranteed Profits. Progressive States. Retrieved from: http://www.progressivestates.org
Thursday, February 25, 2010
Anthem sues the state of Maine over denial of request to increase rates
Anthem Blue Cross-Blue Shield, the largest insurance company in Maine, is suing the state of Maine over the denial of request to increase insurance rates. Anthem requested an increase in rates by as much as 37.8%, but was denied by Maine Insurance Superintendent Mila Kofman. The company claims the increase in cost is necessary to compensate for growing costs and an increase in the use of health care services. Anthem is a subsidiary of the national insurance company WellPoint, Inc.
Anthem Blue Cross-Blue Shield bought out a non-profit insurance company and has raised premium rates 10 times since. The average individual insurance-payer in Maine pays more than four times as much for insurance as they did ten years ago; before Anthem had a monopoly on the insurance market in Maine. The company controls about 79% of the Maine health care insurance market and provide service for more than 12,000 people statewide.
Anthem isn’t suing for an increase in insurance rates, but instead for a 3% guaranteed profit margin for 2010. Anthem’s rates have gone up 85% in the last 10 years in Maine. (3) A lawyer in the Attorney General’s office claims that going a year without a guaranteed profit will not drain the company and Mila Kofman calls Anthem’s request “excessive”. (3) Mila Kofman denied Anthem’s proposed average rate increase of 18.5% last year, instead approving a 10.9% increase. Anthem retaliated by suing the state and has proposed an average 23% increase for the year 2010. (2)
The state of Maine has no obligation to guarantee profits if the rate increases are discriminatory towards customers or excessive. Anthem is claiming that they are being discriminated against relative to other companies in Maine because another individual insurer in Maine was provided a 3% profit and risk margin for 2010. (1) Anthem claims this violates their equal protection rights under both the federal and state Constitutions. (4) However, there is no statute mandating that Maine provide Anthem or any other insurance company with a guaranteed profit.
President Obama notes rate hikes as a cautionary tale and previews “of coming attractions” (2) unless extensive health reform is executed. Joe Ditre, executive director of Consumers for Affordable Health Care, Maine’s largest consumer-health coalition, says that “health insurer’s profit expectations may have to change”. (2) “Companies are entitled to make some profit…however, it can’t be over the public good” he said. (2)
2. De Hoyos, Martha. (2009, October 5). WellPoint, Inc. Subsidiary Sues State of Maine for Failing to Guarantee Annual Profit Margin of 3%. Common Dreams. Retrieved from: http://www.commondreams.org
3. Gerencher, Kristen. (2010, February 18). States grapple with health-insurer rate hikes. Market Watch. Retrieved from: http://marketwatch.com
4. Huang, Josie. (2009, October 5). Anthem Sues State of Maine over Rate Hike Request Denial. MPBN. Retrieved from: http://www.mpbn.net
5. Thompson, Adam. (2009, October 8). Health Insurer Sues Maine for Guaranteed Profits. Progressive States. Retrieved from: http://www.progressivestates.org
Friday, February 19, 2010
News Release
Sasha Kauffman, February 20, 2010 The bi-annual Greek talent show is this Thursday night February 18, 2010 at 7pm. Every semester, during Fall Greek Week and Spring Greek Winter Carnival, Greeks put on a talent show. The show celebrates the creative talents and friendly competition of fraternities and sororities once a semester.
Each semesters’ [Greek] week has a different theme. This semester’s theme is Disney and Greeks will be performing to and dressed to Disney in the show. Nine fraternities and five sororities will be participating in the event, of the 18 fraternities and seven sororities on campus.
Greek Week and Greek Winter Carnival are week-long competitions between fraternities and sororities on campus. Greeks compete for the most points through various participation events all week. This semester there was a canned food drive, snowball fight, sled race and Disney trivia, among other events. Every semester there is letter sign-in day, when Greeks wear their letters all day and compete to sign-in the most members for their chapter.
The talent show is the largest and final event of the week. Fraternities and sororities dress-up, choreograph dance routines, act and sing during the show. The acts represent the individuality and creativity of each chapter and are funny and in good-spirit.
Last semester’s talent show was a Nickelodeon theme. Greeks dressed up as characters such as Doug from ‘Doug’ and cat-dog from ‘Cat-dog’. They wrote songs, played musical instruments and performed dance routines. This semester’s theme has brought as much excitement and entertainment as the last. It is a theme that every student is familiar with and grew up with. Disney characters and songs being performed in the talent show include the Mickey Mouse Club, the Lion King, Peter Pan, Aladdin and Beauty and the Beast.
This semester’s talent show is in Minsky hall and free to all students. For further details contact Gustavo Burkett on First Class. [For immediate release]
Thursday, February 11, 2010
Profile
Jasmine Dawn looks like your average college student. She’s blonde, attractive, blue-eyed and always smiling. She lives in the dorms, eats lunch at the Union, works on campus and goes to class most days. But what sets her apart from the average UMaine student is that she’s straightedge and LDS. What makes her even more different? She used to have a mohawk and colored hair and used to experiment with the things most teenagers experiment with.
Jasmine is a first-year modern language major. She’s an eighteen-year-old girl from Farmington, New Hampshire. She doesn’t drink, she doesn’t smoke, she abstains from sex until marriage and she attends church every weekend. Is this hard for her? No, she says. “People say it’s hard being straightedge in college, but it’s not a struggle for me because those things don’t tempt me” she explains. Flashback to the 15 year-old Jasmine and you’ll see a girl with a green mohawk, going to hardcore shows and the occasional party on the weekends. Around this time, she began going to church with her grandmother and “decided to follow the teachings of LDS.” She decided to become straightedge and LDS because “[she] had to pick what was best for [her], and deducted that the straightedge lifestyle was best for [her].”
The University of Maine was not her first-choice school. Her dream school is Brigham Young University in Utah, a university where 98% of the students are Mormon. But she liked UMaine after visiting a couple of times and feels a sense of security and place here. “I came from a really small town, where everybody, including myself, is pretty close-minded. But I’ve grown to be a lot more open-minded since being here.” On move-in day her first thought was about being afraid of “having to deal with all these drunk people running around and puking all over the place coming home from parties,” but she’s learned to accept these people and “understand that people live different lifestyles.”
The people who know the 18 year-old Jasmine Dawn could never imagine her as the 15 year-old Jasmine Dawn. But she’s proud of who she’s become and the things she’s abstained from. The biggest problem she’s encountered from her lifestyle is people judging her and “thinking [she’s] lame and that [she doesn’t] go out and do things, because [she has] just as much fun as anyone else.” A daily struggle that she has is the fact that people she met at UMaine don’t know how she used to be, and they don’t understand that she struggles with a lot of temptations here, but she’s remained true to her lifestyle and she continues to have the desire to live the straightedge lifestyle.
Friday, February 5, 2010
Assignment 4-1
Thursday, January 28, 2010
Convergence & Consolidation in Journalism
Media convergence is a necessary evil in today’s journalism field. The convergence of different media formats such as television, newspaper and radio provide more than one outlet for news access. This is an advantage for audiences because it allows them to access news through more than one outlet (video, writing, graphics, etc). Convergence is also beneficial for news corporations because it allows the news to reach a broader and larger demographic; allowing more viewers to access information.
Convergence is not all good, however. It contributes to loss of jobs and unemployment in media formats such as newspapers and magazines because of increased technology. Convergence replaces the old, fundamental way of journalism by allowing journalists to easily access information, true or false, instead of going out and getting it straight from the source, themselves. Overall, convergence is good for the journalism field because it provides news corporations with a larger audience and provides audiences with more ways to access news.
Consolidation in the media is leading to a field of oligopolies that overshadow small, local and personal news programs. These massive conglomerates (Time Warner, Disney, etc) are becoming increasingly concerned with profit, rather than the public interest. These corporations are experiencing an increase in control over the media due to the dwindling number of competitors, and this is bad for the public because it can lead to less voices heard, less coverage, less accuracy and less information being provided. Unchecked media consolidation is not good; it leads to a lack of diversity, less local programming and fewer sources for information and news. It could possibly diminish the quality of journalism by no longer carrying out investigative journalism, which is the “watch dog” job of the media.
Consolidation, in any form, leads to lesser-quality work. It switches the gears of the companies from public interest to private profit. It reduces the amount of information available, because when large companies have a hold on information; they can decide what to do with it. Consolidation is good in terms of cost-cutting and cost-effectiveness, but causes adversities in the credibility, reliability and ethics of the journalism field.
Friday, January 22, 2010
Critique
Friday, January 15, 2010
Photojournalism and doctored photographs
This photo-editing revolution has some believing it will lead to the “downfall of photojournalism” in the United States. Photojournalists are becoming less credible and the public is losing faith in the accuracy and truth of the news. These doctored photographs are winning the Pulitzer Prize and creating a more competitive and unfair environment in the photojournalism world. Photojournalists are feeling the pressure to produce an above-average photo in order to receive publicity, and, to do this they often resort to doctoring and editing photographs.
In 2007, an Ohio newspaper, The Toledo Blade, received a call about suspicions that they had run an altered news photo on the front page four days earlier. The culprit was the famous Allan Detrich, who had a reputation as a brilliant photojournalist. Detrich was twice named Ohio Photographer of the Year and a Pulitzer Prize finalist in 1998. He denied that the photograph he sent to the editor was the photograph he meant to send. He claimed that the altered photograph was for his personal use, and he had mixed up the photos while sending them to the paper. After investigations, 79 of his photographs submitted for publication in early 2007 were found to have been doctored. Detrich admitted to habitually erasing “people, tree limbs, utility poles, electrical wires, light switches and cabinet knobs” from his photographs, as well as adding things like hockey pucks and basketballs into the frame.
Allan Detrich was highly revered and rewarded for his work, but his work was often altered, giving him an unfair advantage with respect to other photojournalists in competition. He is not the only famous journalist to be caught doctoring and altering photographs running in newspapers, on television, in magazines and on billboards. This practice is so commonly used today that it destroys the fundamentals of true, respectable photojournalism.
Doctoring photographs is so easy and so common that there are now professions and organizations completely dedicated to discovering these photos and revealing them. This profession is called “Digital Forensics” and these scientists study the light, depth and pixels of photographs. Doctored photos can be detected by finding spoiled pixel correlations, inconsistent specular highlights and light-source direction, as well as other advanced computer-based techniques.
Why are doctored photographs so bad? Because the public relies on journalists, news anchors, broadcasters and photographers to deliver the truth. With doctored photographs, the credibility and reputation of these sources is at risk. People become increasingly suspicious of news sources as these photos continue to be revealed, and their trust is waiving. The art of photography is at risk because people don’t need to take a perfect picture anymore; they can just doctor it to their pleasure. Photography is an art form, and it needs to remain fair in order to survive. These photographers ultimately do create a better picture, a more newsworthy picture, maybe a picture that will win an award. But the cost of the credibility of the individual photographer and the reputation of the entire journalism field is not worth the rewards reaped for these altered pictures.
Ricchiardi, Sherry. (2007). Distorted Picture. Retrieved from http://www.ajr.org/Article.asp?id=4383
Scientific American. (2010). Digital Forensics: Altered Lance Armstrong Photo Explained. Retrieved from http://www.scientificamerican.com/article.cfm?id=digital-image-forensics-lance-armstrong
Thursday, January 14, 2010
Assignment 1:
1-4 Create a blog entry that discusses a legal or moral issue in journalism. Be sure to cite and link to the articles your use for your entry. Your entry should be between 300-800 words and formatted for online.